Exclusive: Pakistan’s President shrugs off increased militancy in border region
The Globe and Mail, Wednesday, May 23, 2007
SONYA FATAH
![]()
ISLAMABAD — Peace in Afghanistan will not come at the barrel of a gun, Pakistan’s besieged President, Pervez Musharraf, said in a wide-ranging interview in which he suggested talks with the Taliban could be necessary to bring stability to the war-torn country.
“We have to have a multipronged strategy. In Afghanistan it is only the military strategy which is working now,” General Musharraf said in an exclusive interview with The Globe and Mail.
“[The] political element is the negotiations between warring factions. Who are the warring factions? Warring factions are the Afghan government and the coalition forces on one side and the militant Taliban and even non-Taliban … so some form of negotiations between these two.”
“Maybe, there are groups who want to give up militancy and negotiate … so I can’t lay down whether you negotiate with the Taliban, but [if] they want to go on fighting, you don’t negotiate with them, take a military angle. You negotiate, you develop contacts with people who are not for fighting.”
Taking little responsibility for the growing sense of political instability in Pakistan and increased militancy along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, a defiant Gen. Musharraf insisted that Pakistan was the only country that had a military, political, developmental and administrative strategy to defeating extremism.
“I would tell everyone: Come and learn from us. We are sitting here knowing exactly what is happening on the ground,” he said. “You sitting in the West don’t know anything. So, don’t teach me, come and learn from us. Come and understand the environment. And then decide on what has to be done and what doesn’t have to be done.”
The President also did not back down from controversial comments he made last year comparing the casualties suffered by Canada and the Pakistani military.
“Unfortunately the people in the West think that their lives are more important than our lives. … They think the gun fodder should be from these countries like Pakistan and developing countries,” he said.
“If their soldiers, one soldier, dies, there is a problem, but 500 of ours have died. And then, yet they are blaming us. Isn’t 500 important? … And yet Pakistan is blamed for not doing enough.”
Gen. Musharraf’s confident assertiveness during the interview is at odds with the mood in Pakistan, where growing protests after his suspension of the nation’s top judge and riots in the country’s largest city present him with the greatest challenge of his nearly eight-year run as president and army chief.
Critics have assailed Pakistan over a controversial 2006 peace deal with pro-Taliban militants aimed at ending five years of violent unrest in the semi-autonomous North Waziristan region bordering Afghanistan. The accords brokered between the government and the pro-Taliban political party, the Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam, after which the government released militants, were seen by many as a setback for the government and a victory for extremist forces.
But Gen. Musharraf defended the approach of reaching out to local power brokers as a way of breaking the cycle of violence. “These are the tribal maliks [leaders] and elders. Locate them. Identify them, deal with them, wean them away. That’s the strategy that should have been adopted a long time back, but we left the field open for the Taliban, so every one is now suppressed and they are scared. Either they have joined them or they are lying low.”
Although Pakistan’s intelligence agency has been accused of helping establish the Taliban movement, Gen. Musharraf insists his country played no role, although he acknowledges it gave the extremists legitimacy by being among the only countries to establish diplomatic relations when Taliban mullahs took over the government of Afghanistan.
“I know for sure – 200 per cent – that they were not a creation of Pakistan. They were a creation of circumstances in Afghanistan,” he said. “They [Afghan warlords] were ravaging and killing and butchering each other. That gave rise to this.”
While admitting he was concerned about the growing domestic opposition to his government, Gen. Musharraf emphasized the achievements made by his administration during the interview.
Nonetheless, politically the General is still struggling to contain the fallout from his March 9 firing of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, recent violence in Karachi and an on-going stand-off between the government and hard-line Islamists holed up in an Islamabad mosque.
A rolling series of protests and strikes have been led primarily by legal bodies and supported by opposition parties. The Islamist coalition that allowed the General to stay in uniform, has become very vocal in its opposition to him.
Popularity: 7% [?]
Sonya, Hi. Congratulations on getting Gen M for interview! Hard work pays off.
But, (and I’m not sure it’s always the author who makes the headlines, but if it is…) “Pugnacious Musharraf” is a pretty loaded beginning, no? Even “strident” or “defensive” or something similar is a bit prejudicial, but less derogatory. Perhaps, you accurately captured his mood, but to me, the word seems to mar an otherwise excellent article. Thanks and look forward to the day we meet again…
Kind regards,
z
Thanks Zack:
I agree. I have to repeat this mantra often – “headlines” have nothing to do with me. And its not the first time someone has noticed a fracture between the story and the headline. Regardless, your comment is noted.
Hope you’re well. How is it going?
Cheers,
Sonya